Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br:8080/handle/123456789/827
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCenci, Maximiliano Sérgio-
dc.contributor.authorPiva, Evandro-
dc.contributor.authorPotrich, Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorFormolo, Elenita-
dc.contributor.authorDemarco, Flávio Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorPowers, John Michel-
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-27T15:48:54Z-
dc.date.available2013-11-27T15:48:54Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationCENCI, Maximiliano Sérgio ; PIVA, Evandro ; POTRICH, Fernando ; FORMOLO, Elenita ; DEMARCO, Flávio Fernando ; POWERS, John M. . Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials. Brazilian Dental Journal, Ribeirão Preto, v. 15, n.1, p. 13-18, 2004.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0103-6440-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/827-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to verify the ability of different adhesive materials to prevent microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations. Standard cavities were prepared in both buccal and lingual surfaces of 35 bovine incisors. The gingival wall was located in cementum/dentin and the occlusal wall in enamel. Teeth (n=35) were divided into 5 groups, according to material employed (one glass-ionomer cement, two resin cements, one adhesive system, and Copalex varnish as a control). Following restoration, the teeth were submitted to thermal cycling. The teeth were subsequently immersed in methylene blue dye and sectioned to allow assessment of microleakage. Nonparametric statistical analysis indicated that all materials demonstrated less leakage than the control group (p<0.01). No leakage was found using the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement, which was significantly different from the other adhesive materials (p<0.05). Leakage in enamel was lower than in cementum/dentin margins. It was concluded that bonded amalgam was an effective technique, since all materials prevented microleakage in enamel and cementum/dentin, when compared to the control group, except Panavia in cementum/dentin margins.pt_BR
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Fabiano Malheiro (fabianomalheiro22@hotmail.com) on 2013-11-27T15:27:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Microleakage in Bonded Amalgam Restorations.pdf: 512606 bytes, checksum: de70b96b7a43d818cd9834d590734f49 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Fabiano Malheiro(fabianomalheiro22@hotmail.com) on 2013-11-27T15:48:54Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Microleakage in Bonded Amalgam Restorations.pdf: 512606 bytes, checksum: de70b96b7a43d818cd9834d590734f49 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2013-11-27T15:48:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Microleakage in Bonded Amalgam Restorations.pdf: 512606 bytes, checksum: de70b96b7a43d818cd9834d590734f49 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2004en
dc.language.isoen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherDental Foundation of Ribeirão Pretopt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesv.15, n.1;-
dc.subjectBonded amalgampt_BR
dc.subjectMicroleakagept_BR
dc.subjectBovine teethpt_BR
dc.titleMicroleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materialspt_BR
dc.typearticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora: Artigos de periódicos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials.pdf500,59 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.