O impacto da ADPF 635 na segurança pública do estado do Rio de Janeiro: potencialização ou desarticulação dos legados autoritários?

Abstract

The Claim of Non-Compliance with Fundamental Precept No. 635 is the subject of this dissertation. The general objective was to understand how the impacts caused by the Claim of Non-Compliance with Fundamental Precept No. 635 act on the authoritarian legacies of public security in Rio de Janeiro. The research problem to be answered was: What are the impacts of ADPF 635 on the public security scenario of the state of Rio de Janeiro? In what way do these impacts act on the dismantling or strengthening of the authoritarian legacies in public security in Rio de Janeiro? To this end, the qualitative research methodology was employed, using document analysis techniques and the application of semi-structured interviews. As for the documents, the sample included: a Research Report and a Technical Note produced by the Research Group on New Illegalisms, the initial petition of the Claim in question and a Research Report prepared by a Working Group established within the scope of the National Research Council. Regarding the interviews, four people were interviewed, one of whom is a member of a social movement active in the state of Rio de Janeiro, and the others are researchers on the topic of public security in the area, as well as professors from the Fluminense Federal University. Guided by the concept of legacies of authoritarianism, a key idea of this dissertation, we conclude that the impacts caused by the Claim of Non-Compliance with Fundamental Precept No. 635 have an impact on the dismantling of legacies of authoritarianism in public security, while the state government of Rio de Janeiro was responsible for contributing to the robustness of authoritarian legacies in this field.