Solidão e Comunicação em Nietzsche: uma tensão na obra

Abstract

This work intends, above all, to highlight a fundamental problem in Thus spoke Zarathustra, namely: there is a tension between loneliness and communication that ultimately determines the course of this book claims regarding affirmative intention of Nietzsche. At the same time as the radical solitude enables unique experiences, the communication becomes impaired, since it is based on a predetermined language for moral values (gregarious), does not represent, then, what is unique and not transferable. The result is a problematic book, in relation to their address ("a book for everyone and anyone") and in relation to its internal development (Zarathustra's disappointment when you want to communicate, initially to people, at the "Prologue", to his disciples, and finally, to the superior men). What Zarathustra wants to communicate, initially, and intensely in books I and II, is the superman, which proves to be a means to support the eternal return. Without this support the realization (that ultimately ends up consisting of, in addition, a way of understanding "affirmatively" the cyclical nature of the world), the eternal return can not be communicated and remains, according to the hypothesis defended, a solitary and silent thought. We assume, finally, in this work, the extemporaneity of Thus spoke Zarathustra; waiting for an appropriate hearing and those who have an experience similar to Nietzsche/Zarathustra